Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 10 of 28 (0.03 seconds)
Khoday Distilleries Ltd. (Now Khoday ... vs Sri Mahadeshwara Sahakara Sakkare ... on 1 March, 2019
cites
Article 141 in Constitution of India [Constitution]
The Code of Civil Procedure, 1908
Abbai Maligai Partnership Firm And Anr vs K. Santhakumaran And Ors on 9 September, 1998
"26. The underlying logic attaching efficacy to an order of
the Supreme Court dismissing SLP after hearing counsel
for the parties is discernible from a recent three-Judge
Bench decision of this Court in Abbai Maligai Partnership
Firm v. K. Santhakumaran [(1998) 7 SCC 386] . In the
matter of eviction proceeding initiated before the Rent
Controller, the order passed therein was subjected to
appeal and then revision before the High Court. Special
leave petitions were preferred before the Supreme Court
where the respondents were present on caveat. Both the
sides were heard through the Senior Advocates
representing them. The special leave petitions were
dismissed. The High Court thereafter entertained review
petitions which were highly belated and having condoned
the delay reversed the orders made earlier in civil revision
petitions. The orders in review were challenged by filing
appeals under leave granted on special leave petitions.
This Court observed that what was done by the learned
Single Judge was “subversive of judicial discipline”. The
facts and circumstances of the case persuaded this Court
to form an opinion that the tenants were indulging in
vexatious litigations, abusing the process of the Court by
approaching the High Court and the very entertainment of
review petitions (after condoning a long delay of 221 days)
and then reversing the earlier orders was an affront to the
order of this Court. However the learned Judges deciding
the case have nowhere in the course of their judgment
relied on doctrine of merger for taking the view they have
done. A careful reading of this decision brings out the
correct statement of law and fortifies us in taking the view
as under.”
Kerala Private Forests (Vesting and Assignment) Act, 1971
Workmen Of Cochin Port Trust vs Board Of Trustees Of The Cochin Port ... on 5 May, 1978
8 Proposition based on judgments in Workmen v. Board of Trustees of the Cochin Port Trust,
(1978) 3 SCC 119; Western India Match Co. Ltd. v. Industrial Tribunal, AIR 1958 Mad 398;
Management Of Western India Match ... vs Industrial Tribunal And Anr. on 12 March, 1958
8 Proposition based on judgments in Workmen v. Board of Trustees of the Cochin Port Trust,
(1978) 3 SCC 119; Western India Match Co. Ltd. v. Industrial Tribunal, AIR 1958 Mad 398;
Indian Oil Corporation Ltd vs State Of Bihar & Ors on 13 August, 1986
Indian Oil Corpn. Ltd. v. State of Bihar, (1986) 4 SCC 146; Rup Diamonds v. Union of India,
(1989) 2 SCC 356; Wilson v. Colchester Justices, (1985) 2 All ER 97 (HL); Supreme Court
Employees' Welfare Assn. v. Union of India, (1989) 4 SCC 187; Yogendra Narayan Chowdhury
v. Union of India, (1996) 7 SCC 1; V.M. Salgaocar & Bros.
Rup Diamonds & Ors vs Union Of India And Ors on 2 January, 1989
Indian Oil Corpn. Ltd. v. State of Bihar, (1986) 4 SCC 146; Rup Diamonds v. Union of India,
(1989) 2 SCC 356; Wilson v. Colchester Justices, (1985) 2 All ER 97 (HL); Supreme Court
Employees' Welfare Assn. v. Union of India, (1989) 4 SCC 187; Yogendra Narayan Chowdhury
v. Union of India, (1996) 7 SCC 1; V.M. Salgaocar & Bros.
Supreme Court Employees' Welfare ... vs Union Of India (Uoi) And Anr. on 24 July, 1989
9 Penu Balakrishna Iyer v. Ariya M. Ramaswami Iyer, AIR 1965 SC 195; Abbai Maligai Partnership
Firm v. K. Santhakumaran, (1998) 7 SCC 386; Shankar Ramchandra Abhyankar v. Krishnaji
Dattatreya Bapat, (1969) 2 SCC 74; Sushil Kumar Sen v. State of Bihar, (1975) 1 SCC 774;
Gopabandhu Biswal v. Krishna Chandra Mohanty, (1998) 4 SCC 447; Junior Telecom Officers
Forum v. Union of India, 1993 Supp (4) SCC 693 and Supreme Court Employees' Welfare Assn.
Case, (1989) 4 SCC 187.