Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 3 of 3 (0.28 seconds)The Code of Civil Procedure, 1908
Sitarampur Coal Co. Ld. vs T.H. Colley on 8 July, 1908
No express consideration was alleged Or proved by the servant. The Court refused to imply as a consideration an agreement by the servant to induce his master to carry on business through the brokers as, in its opinion, such an agreement would be inconsistent with the relation of master and servant and, therefore, void. The rule that an agreement tending to create interest against duty is void Its also illustrated by the decision in Sitarampur Coal Co., Ltd., v. T. H. Colley 13 Cal WN 59 where the manager of a company had purchased two secondhand boilers from an Inspector of Boilers employed by the Government of Bengal.
1