Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 2 of 2 (0.65 seconds)

M/S. Ansal Properties & Industries Ltd vs State Of Haryana & Anr on 23 January, 2009

15. Mr. De' vetre, Learned Senior Advocate appearing for Respondent No.1, has first submitted that Section 10E (4B) is contained in a part of the Act headed "Constitution of Board of Company Law Administration". That provision deals only with the Constitution of the Board and formation of the Benches of the Board. It does not at all deal with the power to transfer matters. The only provision for "transfer" of any matters is to be found in the second proviso to Regulation 4 (3) of the CLB Regulations. The said proviso expressly sets out the power of the Chairman to transfer any matter pending before any Regional Bench. The intent is plainly and unambiguously expressed. Relying on the decision of the Hon'ble Supreme Court in Ansal Properties and Industries Ltd. vs. State of Haryana1, it is submitted on behalf of Respondent No.1 that it is settled law that the Court cannot read anything into a statutory provision, which is plain and unambiguous and if the language of the enactment is clear and unambiguous, it would not be proper for the Courts to add any words thereto and evolve some legislative intent, not found in the statute.
Supreme Court of India Cites 13 - Cited by 62 - M Sharma - Full Document

Rasid Javed & Ors vs State Of U.P. & Anr on 5 July, 2010

Relying on the decisions of the Hon'ble Supreme Court in Rasid Javed & Ors. vs. State of Uttar Pradesh and another 1 and District Collector, Chittoor vs. Chittoor District Groundnut Traders Association & Ors. 2, Mr. Khambata has submitted that it is well settled that the powers of a delegate cannot be expanded to anything beyond the scope and terms of the delegation. If any order is framed in excess of the powers delegated, such order would be illegal and void. No such order can be passed relying upon the general powers.
Supreme Court of India Cites 29 - Cited by 77 - Full Document
1