Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 3 of 3 (0.22 seconds)

Geeta I. Koulagi vs The State Of Karnataka on 13 February, 2019

20. This aspect is also considered by the Hon'ble Apex Court in the recent judgment in the case of Geeta vs. State of Karnataka supra wherein also it is held that, "to satisfy the requirement of instigation, the accused by his acts or omission or by a continued course of conduct should create such circumstances that the deceased was left with no other option except to commit suicide."
Supreme Court - Daily Orders Cites 0 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Pradeep Kumar Kesarwani vs The State Of Uttar Pradesh on 7 January, 2022

21. The similar observations are made by the Hon'ble Apex Court in the case of Pradeep Kumar Kesarwani vs. The State of Uttar Pradesh and anr, reported in 2025 LiveLaw (SC) 880 wherein by referring catena of decisions, it is held that, "the following steps should ordinarily determine the veracity of a prayer for quashing, raised by an accused by invoking the power vested in the High Court under Section 482 of the Cr.P.C.: --
Supreme Court - Daily Orders Cites 0 - Cited by 0 - Full Document
1