Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 2 of 2 (0.28 seconds)
Glorious Investment Limited vs Dunlop International Limited & Anr on 4 November, 2025 cites

Nirmala Sahu vs State Of Chhattisgarh 40 Wps/432/2017 ... on 18 May, 2018

(6) Nor because it is a body to which a matter is referred by another body. (See R. v. Electricity Commissioners [R. v. Electricity Commissioners, (1924) 1 KB 171 (CA)])" and observed at: (Shell Co. of Australia Ltd. case [Shell Co. of Australia Ltd. v. Federal Commr. of Taxation, 1931 AC 275 (PC)], AC p. 298) "An Administrative Tribunal may act judicially, but still remain an Administrative Tribunal as distinguished from a Court, strictly so-called. Mere externals do not make a direction to an administrative officer by an ad hoc tribunal an exercise by a court of judicial power."
Chattisgarh High Court Cites 5 - Cited by 4774 - M M Shrivastava - Full Document

Nahida Rishad Cooper vs Rishad Darayas Cooper on 18 May, 2018

16. The same principle was reiterated by this Court in Bharat Bank Ltd. v. Employees [Bharat Bank Ltd. v. Employees, 1950 SCC 470 : 1950 SCR 459] and Maqbool Hussain v. State of Bombay [Maqbool Hussain v. State of Bombay, (1953) 1 SCC 736 : 1953 SCR 730] where the test of a judicial tribunal as laid down in a passage from Cooper v. Wilson [Cooper v. Wilson, (1937) 2 KB 309 at p. 340 (CA)] was adopted by this Court: (Cooper case [Cooper v. Wilson, (1937) 2 KB 309 at p. 340 (CA)], KB pp. 340-41) "... A true judicial decision presupposes an existing dispute between two or more parties, and then involves four requisites:
Supreme Court - Daily Orders Cites 0 - Cited by 4 - Full Document
1