Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 3 of 3 (0.24 seconds)
Idamakanti Madhusudhana Reddy vs The Registrar Of Trade Marks on 29 February, 2024 cites

M/S. Nandhini Deluxe vs M/S. Karnataka Cooperative Milk ... on 26 July, 2018

In Nandhini Deluxe Vs Karnataka Coop. Milk Producers Federation Ltd., case, the Hon'ble Supreme Court has held that Nandhini is a generic name. If the facts of the present case is tested on the plane of the ratio of this case, it becomes evident that (a) Dr.Reddy is a generic name since Reddy being a name of a community; (b) that they are in different class of services.
Supreme Court of India Cites 32 - Cited by 48 - A K Sikri - Full Document

Vishnudas Trading As Vishnudas ... vs The Vazir Sultan Tobacco Company ... on 11 October, 1990

26.6. The nature and style of the business of the appellant and the respondent are altogether different. Whereas the respondent is a Cooperative Federation of Milk Producers of Karnataka and is producing and selling milk and milk products under the mark “Nandini”, the business of the appellant is that of running restaurants and the registration of mark “NANDHINI” as sought by the appellant is in respect of various foodstuffs sold by its in its restaurants.” 8.2.This case has some similarity to the facts involved in both the cases cited above. While in Vishnudas Trading Vs Vazir Sultan Tobacco Co. Ltd., case, the dispute was over the trademark Charminar, while one used Charminar for cigarettes, the other used the trademark Charminar for other tobacco products and both fell under the broad classification “manufactured tobacco”, yet the Hon'ble Supreme Court has held that in the market they are 10/14 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis (T)CMA(TM)/191/2023 (OA/SR.195/2020/TM/CHN) differently sold and the consumers will not be confused by the use of similar mark.
Madras High Court Cites 28 - Cited by 14 - Full Document

Vishnudas Trading As Vishnudas vs The Vazir Sultan Tobaccoco. Ltd. ... on 9 July, 1996

● Placing reliance on Vishnudas Trading Vs Vazir Sultan Tobacco Co. Ltd., [1997 4 SCC 201], the learned counsel submitted that even if a mark is registered in the same class but not used for identical goods or services, the Registrar can take no exception either under Section 3/14 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis (T)CMA(TM)/191/2023 (OA/SR.195/2020/TM/CHN) 11(1) or under Section 11(2) and cannot refuse to register a mark.
Supreme Court of India Cites 38 - Cited by 42 - G N Ray - Full Document
1