Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 2 of 2 (0.18 seconds)
Ishwar Niwruti Danane vs Laxman Fakirsa Burbure on 30 July, 2004 cites

Ibrahim Abdulrahim Shaikh vs Krishnamorari Sripatlal Agarwal on 5 August, 1993

In Ibrahim Abdul Rehman Shaikh (supra) the Supreme Court only laid down that after an application for fixing the standard rent is made, it is not necessary for the tenant to further make an application under Section 11(3) of the Act for fixation of interim rent within one month. Therefore, the said judgments is of no assistance to the petitioner.
Supreme Court of India Cites 8 - Cited by 7 - K Ramaswamy - Full Document

Firm Of Harbanslal Jagmohandas & Anr vs Prabhudas Shivlal on 16 April, 1971

In Harbanslal Jagmohandas v. Prabhudas Shivlal reported in AIR 1976 SUPREME COURT 205 the Supreme Court has laid down that in order to avoid the operation of Section 12(3)(a) of the Act the dispute in regard to standard rent or permitted increases must be raised at the latest before the expiry of one month from the date of receipt of the notice by filing an application for determination of the amount of standard rent or permitted increases.
Supreme Court of India Cites 8 - Cited by 48 - C A Vaidyialingam - Full Document
1