Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 9 of 9 (0.55 seconds)

R.J. Singh Ahuluwalia vs The State Of Delhi on 7 September, 1970

In this Court Mr. Anthony questioned the legality of the in- vestigation by submitting that the only police agency having jurisdiction to investigate into the allegations against the, appellant was the Delhi Special Police Establishment. The investigation by the anti-corruption branch, Delhi, being thus without jurisdiction, it was contended that the appellant's trial and conviction were, on this ground alone, wholly illegal. Mr. Anthony relied on R. J. Singh Ahuluwalia v. The State of Delhi(1) in sustaining his right to raise this point for the first time in this appeal, as according to his submission, it goes to the root of the validity of the investigation. If the investigation is unauthorised the trial springing from it cannot be considered lawful, said the counsel. The appel- (1) (1970) 3 S.C.R. 451.
Supreme Court of India Cites 5 - Cited by 21 - I D Dua - Full Document

The State Of Andhra Pradesh vs N. Venugopal And Others on 9 May, 1963

The same view was, taken in the Slate of Andhra Pradesh v. M. Venugopal (4) and more recently in Khandu Sonu Dhobi v. State of Maharashtra(5). The decisions of the Calcutta, Punjab and Saurashtra High Courts relied upon by Mr. Anthony deal with different points : in any event to the extent they contain any observations against the view expressed by this Court in the decision just cited those observations cannot be considered good law.
Supreme Court of India Cites 21 - Cited by 87 - K C Gupta - Full Document

Khandu Sonu Dhobi And Anr vs State Of Maharashtra on 15 February, 1972

The same view was, taken in the Slate of Andhra Pradesh v. M. Venugopal (4) and more recently in Khandu Sonu Dhobi v. State of Maharashtra(5). The decisions of the Calcutta, Punjab and Saurashtra High Courts relied upon by Mr. Anthony deal with different points : in any event to the extent they contain any observations against the view expressed by this Court in the decision just cited those observations cannot be considered good law.
Supreme Court of India Cites 12 - Cited by 49 - H R Khanna - Full Document
1