M/S Mehta Stone Export House vs Cce, Jaipur-I on 4 March, 2008
3. The learned A.R. vehemently opposes the request for remand. He submits that the present appeals cannot be considered at par with the appeal which was considered by the Tribunal and remanded. This is because unlike the earlier case, in this case, no submissions were made regarding CAS-4 and CENVAT credit. He relies on the decision in the case of Kneader House Vs CCE Delhi [2013(290)ELT 249 Tri-Del)] to submit that additional evidence cannot be allowed.