Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 14 (0.14 seconds)

Nikesh Tarachand Shah vs Union Of India on 23 November, 2017

5. Learned senior counsel submitted arguments mainly highlighting Section 45 of PMLA Act. He submits that twin conditions contemplated under Section 45 of PMLA Act were held to be unconstitutional as it violates Articles 14 and 21 of the Constitution of India by the Hon'ble Apex Court in Nikesh Tarachand Shah Vs. Union of India and another1 and thereafter an amendment was carried out vide Finance Act, 2018 (Act 13 of 2018) with effect from 19.04.2018, but however the original Section 45 (1)(ii) has not been revived or resurrected by the said Amendment Act and further, the amending Section 45 (1) of PMLA Act, which came into effect from 19.04.2018 is silent about its retrospective applicability. Hence, as of today, there is no rigor of said two further limitations under original Section 45(1)(ii) of PMLA Act for releasing a person on bail under the said Act.
Supreme Court of India Cites 101 - Cited by 1782 - R F Nariman - Full Document
1   2 Next