Bhagubhai Dhanabhai Khalasi & Anr vs The State Of Gujarat & Ors on 5 April, 2007
35. The appellant‟s right to access to justice has caused him to suffer
worse consequences, than the appellant has been subjected to,
pursuant to the order which it has been aggrieved about and
challenged. The Supreme Court in Bhagubhai Dhnabhai Khalasi
(supra) has held that a party having a grievance must have a
remedy; that access to justice is a human right; that when there
exists such a right a disputant must have a remedy in terms of the
doctrine ubi jus ibi remedium (where there is right there is remedy);
that the appellant could not have been placed in a worse position.