Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 7 of 7 (0.38 seconds)
Shailly vs State on 30 August, 2011 cites

Comptroller And Auditor General Of ... vs K.S. Jagannathan & Anr on 1 April, 1986

In the case of The Comptroller and Auditor General of India, Gian Prakash, New Delhi and another Vs. K.S. Jagannathan and another - (AIR 1987 SC 537), a three-Judge Bench of this Court referred to Halsbury's Laws of England, Fourth Edition, Volume I paragraph 89 to illustrate the range of this remedy and quoted with approval the following passage from Halsbury about the efficacy of Mandamus:
Supreme Court of India Cites 15 - Cited by 475 - D P Madon - Full Document

M/S Sardar Associates & Ors vs Punjab & Sind Bank & Ors on 31 July, 2009

50. The Appellate Tribunal in passing its order followed the dicta laid down in Constitution Bench judgment in Central Bank of India (supra), wherein it was held that: (SCC p.404, para 56) "56. ....RBI directive have not only statutory flavour, any contravention thereof or any default in compliance therewith is punishable under sub- section (4) of S. 46 of the Banking Regulation Act, 1949".
Supreme Court of India Cites 30 - Cited by 165 - S B Sinha - Full Document

Uco Bank, Calcutta vs Commissioner Of Income-Tax, West ... on 13 May, 1999

In UCO Bank v. CIT, this Court opined that "the circulars as contemplated therein cannot be adverse to the assessee" (SCC p.605, para 9). Thus, the authority which wields the power for its own advantage when required to wield it in a manner it considers just by relaxing the rigour of the law or in other permissible manners as laid down in Section 119. The power is given for the purpose of just, proper and efficient management of the work of assessment and in public interest.
Supreme Court of India Cites 16 - Cited by 563 - S V Manohar - Full Document
1