Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 4 of 4 (0.41 seconds)
Vinod Singh @ Vijendra Singh vs State Of Rajasthan Through Pp on 8 August, 2019 cites

Dayal Singh & Ors vs State Of Uttaranchal on 3 August, 2012

"If the First Information Report lodged by the accused with regard to the same incident was not exhibited by the prosecution or evidence with regard to hospitalization and injury reports of the accused were also not placed, relying on Dayal Singh and others vs. State of Uttaranchal, (2012) 8 SCC 263 and Gajoo vs. State of Uttarakhand, (2012) 9 SCC 532 it was submitted that at best it may be a case of defective investigation which cannot dent the credibility of the prosecution case with regard to the premediated murderous assault with a common intention.
Supreme Court of India Cites 26 - Cited by 293 - S Kumar - Full Document

Gajoo vs State Of Uttarakhand on 13 September, 2012

"If the First Information Report lodged by the accused with regard to the same incident was not exhibited by the prosecution or evidence with regard to hospitalization and injury reports of the accused were also not placed, relying on Dayal Singh and others vs. State of Uttaranchal, (2012) 8 SCC 263 and Gajoo vs. State of Uttarakhand, (2012) 9 SCC 532 it was submitted that at best it may be a case of defective investigation which cannot dent the credibility of the prosecution case with regard to the premediated murderous assault with a common intention.
Supreme Court of India Cites 18 - Cited by 95 - S Kumar - Full Document

Manoj Kumar vs The State Of Himachal Pradesh on 15 May, 2018

there was no premediated attack. The parties being related, and the existence of a land dispute between them, when they met near the house of Yellappa Patil a verbal duel ensued followed by a scuffle in which both sides received injuries. The F.I.R. lodged by the respondents, their admission to the Hospital for treatment and injury reports have all been suppressed by the prosecution. The fact that the defence may not have been taken under Section 313, Cr.P.C. was inconsequential as the prosecution had to prove the charge beyond all reasonable doubt. Reliance was placed on Manoj Kumar vs. State of Himachal (Downloaded on 29/08/2019 at 11:09:03 PM) (7 of 15) [CRLA-80/2017] Pradesh, (2018) 7 SCC 327, to submit that in absence of a premediated plan to attack, a sudden quarrel in the background of civil dispute with regard to land pending between the parties, the order of the High Court calls for no interference."
Supreme Court of India Cites 15 - Cited by 216 - N V Ramana - Full Document
1