Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 4 of 4 (0.57 seconds)
Dr.Krishna Menon vs High Court Of Kerala on 22 December, 2022 cites

Justice K.S.Puttaswamy(Retd) And Anr. vs Union Of India And Ors. on 24 August, 2017

If such an individual is not allowed to erase his past and control the information on his person, no doubt, it would violate his right to live with dignity. However, the Court cannot make a declaration in current proceedings, acknowledging the right to be forgotten to erase data for the current and the future. That will be against the very essence of the recognition of the right as a right to be forgotten. The Apex Court in the privacy judgment in para.636 of Justice K.S. Puttaswamy's case (supra),realising this aspect, put forward as follows:
Supreme Court of India Cites 294 - Cited by 384 - D Y Chandrachud - Full Document

V.Gopal Reddiar (Dead) By L.R. And Anr vs State Of Tamil Nadu And Anr on 6 December, 1994

Exhibit R3(5) TRUE TYPED COPY OF THE CASE REMOVAL POLICY OF THE RESPONDENT, WHICH IS DISPLAYED ON ITS WEBSITE AT HTTPS://INDIANKANOON.ORG/COURT CASE ONLINE.HTML Exhibit R3(6) A TRUE AND CORRECT COPY OF CLAUSE 20 AND CLAUSE 63 OF DATA PROTECTION BILL, 2021. APPENDIX OF WP(C) 21917/2020 PETITIONER EXHIBITS EXHIBIT P1 A TRUE IMAGE OF THE GOOGLE SEARCH RESULTS OF NIKHIL S RAJAN AS ON 20.09.2020.
Supreme Court of India Cites 26 - Cited by 49 - S V Manohar - Full Document
1