Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 2 of 2 (0.53 seconds)
Dr.Krishna Menon vs High Court Of Kerala on 22 December, 2022 cites

Justice K.S.Puttaswamy(Retd) And Anr. vs Union Of India And Ors. on 24 August, 2017

If such an individual is not allowed to erase his past and control the information on his person, no doubt, it would violate his right to live with dignity. However, the Court cannot make a declaration in current proceedings, acknowledging the right to be forgotten to erase data for the current and the future. That will be against the very essence of the recognition of the right as a right to be forgotten. The Apex Court in the privacy judgment in para.636 of Justice K.S. Puttaswamy's case (supra),realising this aspect, put forward as follows:
Supreme Court of India Cites 294 - Cited by 384 - D Y Chandrachud - Full Document

Karthick Theodre vs The Registrar General on 3 August, 2021

43. The Madras High Court in Karthick Theodre v. Registrar General, Madras High Court and Others [2021 SCC Online Mad 2755], the judgment authored by Justice N.Anand Venkatesh, considered the issue of whether an accused, who has been acquitted of all the charges as against him, had the right to seek erasure of personal information from the public domain. The learned Judge opined, at para.37, as follows:
Madras High Court Cites 35 - Cited by 3 - N A Venkatesh - Full Document
1