Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 3 of 3 (0.24 seconds)
* P.Kunhiraman Nair vs The Taluk Land Board cites

Rajeev vs The District Collector on 23 May, 2014

CRP.Nos.100,119 & 179 of 2013 4 Sl.No. Assignor Document No. Extent 1 Declarant 3637/85 53 cents 2 Declarant 982/89 20 cents 3 Declarant 1415/89 31 cents 4 Declarant 2809/10 25 cents 5 Declarant 4048/82 50 cents 6 Declarant 2029/82 1 Acre 7 Wife of declarant 2808/2000 30 cents TOTAL 3.19 Acres I find logic in the contention of the petitioners that the lands sold should be deleted from their account if the lands subsequently acquired have been added. The Taluk Land Board has evidently not deleted the extent of 3.19 acres of land sold by the declarant and his wife under the various sale deeds. Whether the petitioners in CRP.Nos.119 & 179 of 2013 are entitled to the benefit of Section 7E of the Kerala Land Reforms Act, 1963 has not been considered. The applicability of Section 7E of the Kerala Land Reforms Act, 1963 has to be reconsidered in the light of the dictum in Rajeev v. District Collector [2014 (4) KLT 209] and State of Kerala v. Thomas Kurian [2014 (4) KLT 417]. As to how the acquisiton made by the two married daughters of the CRP.Nos.100,119 & 179 of 2013 5 declarant can be tacked on is also a matter for adjudication. The daughters who were earlier the members of the statutory family have now got married and gone into another family. This aspect of the matter also deserves consideration in the proceedings under Section 87 of the Kerala Land Reforms Act.
Kerala High Court Cites 4 - Cited by 16 - K Ramakrishnan - Full Document

State Of Kerala Represented By vs Thomas Kurian on 26 September, 2012

CRP.Nos.100,119 & 179 of 2013 4 Sl.No. Assignor Document No. Extent 1 Declarant 3637/85 53 cents 2 Declarant 982/89 20 cents 3 Declarant 1415/89 31 cents 4 Declarant 2809/10 25 cents 5 Declarant 4048/82 50 cents 6 Declarant 2029/82 1 Acre 7 Wife of declarant 2808/2000 30 cents TOTAL 3.19 Acres I find logic in the contention of the petitioners that the lands sold should be deleted from their account if the lands subsequently acquired have been added. The Taluk Land Board has evidently not deleted the extent of 3.19 acres of land sold by the declarant and his wife under the various sale deeds. Whether the petitioners in CRP.Nos.119 & 179 of 2013 are entitled to the benefit of Section 7E of the Kerala Land Reforms Act, 1963 has not been considered. The applicability of Section 7E of the Kerala Land Reforms Act, 1963 has to be reconsidered in the light of the dictum in Rajeev v. District Collector [2014 (4) KLT 209] and State of Kerala v. Thomas Kurian [2014 (4) KLT 417]. As to how the acquisiton made by the two married daughters of the CRP.Nos.100,119 & 179 of 2013 5 declarant can be tacked on is also a matter for adjudication. The daughters who were earlier the members of the statutory family have now got married and gone into another family. This aspect of the matter also deserves consideration in the proceedings under Section 87 of the Kerala Land Reforms Act.
Kerala High Court Cites 7 - Cited by 15 - V Chitambaresh - Full Document

Chacko Chummar vs Taluk Land Board on 19 October, 2007

6. 9 acres out of 11 acres was sold by the declarant even one year prior to the revised order of the Taluk Land Board dated 29.8.1978. The Taluk Land Board had treated 11 acres (including 9 acres) as rubber plantation while granting exemption. It is bewildering as to how the proceedings under Section 87 of the Kerala Land Reforms Act, 1963 could be initiated against the declarant who has already parted with his property for consideration. The proceedings under Section 87 of the Kerala Land Reforms Act, 1963 have been initiated only after 27 years from the date of alienation. Where there has been actual conversion of the rubber plantation itself is a moot question to be addressed by the Taluk Land Board. There has not been any wanton or deliberate act by the declarant in the rubber plants being lost by fire. The concept of CRP.Nos.100,119 & 179 of 2013 6 conversion has to be decided in the context of the decision in Chacko Varghese v. Taluk Land Board [1982 KLT 72].
Kerala High Court Cites 2 - Cited by 3 - Full Document
1