Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 2 of 2 (0.21 seconds)
Kurshed Sharfudeen vs Ibp Company Limited on 24 April, 2009 cites

Abl International Ltd. & Anr vs Export Credit Guarantee Corportion Of ... on 18 December, 2003

"40. Although ordinarily a superior Court in exercise of its writ jurisdiction would not enforce the terms of a contract qua contract, it is trite that when an action of the State is arbitrary or discriminatory and, thus, violative of Article 14 of the Constitution of India, a writ petition would be maintainable. (See ABL International Ltd. v. Export Credit Guarantee Corporation of India Limited, [2004] 3 SCC 553.)"
Supreme Court of India Cites 20 - Cited by 1154 - Full Document

Ibrahimpatnam Taluk Vyavasaya Collie ... vs K.Suresh Reddy & Ors on 19 August, 2003

52. The observation made by the Supreme Court in Ibrahimpatnam Taluk Vyavasaya Collie Sangham v. K.Suresh Reddy and Others, JT 2004 [6] SC 70 that "Every man has the legitimate expectation regarding a set of things or facts, which have continued over a period of time, to have become settled so that he can plan his future course of action on the basis of such acceptable situation. Unsettling such facts after long delay upsets not only his entire programme but also affects in the long run the society itself.", was in the context of a validation certificate issued in the year 1974 in favour of the vendors and vendees, which were sought to be cancelled by the Joint Collector, by exercising the suo motu powers under Section 50-B of the Andhra Pradesh (Telangana Area) Tenancy and Agricultural Land Act, 1950, especially in the circumstance that various authorities, including Tahsildar, Special Tahsildar and Authorised Officer under the Act have held that the validation certificates cannot be set aside.
Supreme Court of India Cites 14 - Cited by 104 - S V Patil - Full Document
1