Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 16 (0.03 seconds)

Shri Vishwas Bajirao Patil vs The State Of Maharashtra Through The ... on 3 September, 2019

6. Reliance was placed on Government Resolution dated 3 January 2024, which prescribed quorum as three members. It was submitted that, in view of the said Government Resolution, the co- option made by the petitioners was valid. Learned counsel relied upon the judgment of this Court in Vishwas Bajirao Patil v. State of Maharashtra, 2019 SCC OnLine Bom 1770, and the judgment of the Supreme Court in Vineeta Sharma v. Rakesh Sharma, (2020) 9 SCC 1, to contend that such directions require to be construed as retroactive in nature.
Bombay High Court Cites 22 - Cited by 0 - P Nandrajog - Full Document

Vineeta Sharma vs Rakesh Sharma on 11 August, 2020

6. Reliance was placed on Government Resolution dated 3 January 2024, which prescribed quorum as three members. It was submitted that, in view of the said Government Resolution, the co- option made by the petitioners was valid. Learned counsel relied upon the judgment of this Court in Vishwas Bajirao Patil v. State of Maharashtra, 2019 SCC OnLine Bom 1770, and the judgment of the Supreme Court in Vineeta Sharma v. Rakesh Sharma, (2020) 9 SCC 1, to contend that such directions require to be construed as retroactive in nature.
Supreme Court of India Cites 127 - Cited by 245 - A Mishra - Full Document
1   2 Next