Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 10 (1.31 seconds)
P.Saravanan vs Oriental Structural Engineering ... on 19 January, 2021 cites

National Insurance Co. Ltd vs Pranay Sethi on 31 October, 2017

42.The Tribunal has also not awarded any amounts towards future prospects. Since the deceased Shankar was aged about 28 years at the time of the accident, as per the decision of the Hon’ble Supreme Court in National Insurance Company Limited Vs. Pranay Sethi and Others, (2017) 16 SCC 680, 40% future prospects is to be added to the aforesaid notional income of Rs.10,000/- per month to arrive at a just compensation. The compensation awarded under the other heads stands confirmed.
Supreme Court of India Cites 32 - Cited by 9815 - D Misra - Full Document

Mohammed Siddique vs National Insurance Company Ltd on 8 January, 2020

23. Dealing with somewhat similar cases, the Hon’ble Supreme Court recently in Mohammed Siddique and Another Vs. National Insurance Co. Ltd., 2020 (1) TN MAC 161 (SC) held that in absence of any evidences to show that the wrongful act on the part of the deceased victim contributed either to the accident or to the nature of the injuries sustained, the victim could not have been held guilty of contributory negligence. There the Hon’ble Supreme Court set aside the finding of the Tribunal and the High Court and held that 10% contributory negligence cannot be justified.
Supreme Court of India Cites 9 - Cited by 151 - V Ramasubramanian - Full Document

Magma General Insurance Co. Ltd vs Nanu Ram Alias Chuhru Ram on 18 September, 2018

41. A sum of Rs.25,000/- towards loss of consortium awarded by the Tribunal to the 1st appellant in C.M.A.No.2042 of 2013 appears to be low and the same is enhanced to Rs.40,000/-. Since a sum of Rs.30,000/- awarded towards loss of love and affection by the Tribunal is low, a sum of Rs.80,000/- (40,000 x 2) under the head of loss of filial consortium is to be awarded to the 2nd and 3rd appellants in C.M.A.No.2042 of 2013 as per the decision of the Hon’ble Supreme Court in Magma General Insurance Company Limited Vs. Nanuram @ Chuhru Ram and Others, (2018) 18 SCC 130 : 2018 OnLine SC 1546.
Supreme Court of India Cites 7 - Cited by 4992 - I Malhotra - Full Document

Raj Kumar vs Ajay Kumar & Anr on 18 October, 2010

35. It is noticed that the Tribunal has awarded a sum of Rs.1,12,000/- towards partial permanent disability by considering the extent of 56% disability at the rate of Rs.2,000/- per percentage. In my view, the above computation of compensation for amputation of left foot for the person who depended fully on the physical well being appears to be low. The Tribunal ought to have awarded the compensation under the head of loss of earning capacity instead of permanent disability as per the decision of the Hon’ble Supreme Court in Raj Kumar Vs. Ajay Kumar and Another, (2011) 1 SCC 343 by applying the multiplier.
Supreme Court of India Cites 8 - Cited by 3811 - R V Raveendran - Full Document
1