Sharad Birdhichand Sarda vs State Of Maharashtra on 17 July, 1984
21. The Hon'ble Supreme Court in Sharad Birdhichand
Sarda vs. State of Maharashtra, AIR 1984 Supreme
Court 1622, has held as under:
Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 10 of 15 (0.46 seconds)Jagriti Devi vs State Of H.P on 6 July, 2009
Culpable homicide is murder if the act by which death is
caused is done with the intention of causing death.
Expression "intent" and "knowledge" postulate the existence
of a positive mental attitude which is of different degree. We
are drawing support in this regard from the judgment of Apex
Court in Jagriti Devi vs. State of Himachal Pradesh, AIR
2009 SC 2869.
Devinder Singh And Ors. vs State Of Himachal Pradesh on 17 September, 2003
settled proposition of law, the chain of circumstances
appearing on record should be complete in all respects so
as to lead to the only conclusion that it is accused alone
who has committed the offence. The conditions necessary
in order to enable the court to record the findings of
conviction against an offender on the basis of
circumstantial evidence have been detailed in a judgment
of this Court in Devinder Singh V. State of H.P, 1990 1
Shim LC 82 which reads as under:-
Akhilesh Hajam vs State Of Bihar on 28 April, 1995
[11] It has also been held by the Hon'ble Apex Court in
Akhilesh Halam V. State of Bihar, 1995 Supp3 SCC 357
that the prosecution is not only required to prove each
and every circumstance as relied upon against the
accused, but also that the chain of evidence furnished by
those circumstances must be so complete as not to leave
any reasonable ground for a conclusion consistent with
the innocence of the accused. The relevant portion of this
judgment is reproduced here-as-under:-
State Of Himachal Pradesh vs Dhanwant Singh [Alongwith Criminal ... on 12 February, 2004
20. This Court has again held in State of Himachal
Pradesh Vs. Sunil Kumar, Cr. Appeal No. 326 of 2011
decided on 15.6.2017 as under:
Lakhbir Singh vs State Of Punjab on 26 November, 1993
circumstances so proved, must form a complete
chain without giving room to any other hypothesis
and should be consistent that only the guilt of the
accused (See: Lakhbir Singh vs. State of Punjab, 1994
Suppl. (1) SCC 173)."
State Of Goa vs Pandurang Mohite on 8 December, 2008
integra as the Apex Court in State of Goa V. Pandurang
.
State Of U.P vs Satish on 8 February, 2005
In State
of U.P. v. Satish [2005 (3) SCC 114] it was noted as follows:
Ramreddy Rajeshkhanna Reddy & Anr vs State Of Andhra Pradesh on 24 March, 2006
33. The Hon'ble Apex Court has again held in Ramreddy
Rajeshkhanna Reddy V. State of A.P. [2006 (10) SCC 172 as
under:-
Kanhaiya Lal vs State Of Rajasthan on 13 March, 2014
In Kanhaiya Lal V. State of Rajasthan, 2014 (4) SCC
715 has again held as under:-