Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 2 of 2 (0.23 seconds)
Dr. Abdul Rasheed @ A.R.Babu vs Ifci Limited on 3 December, 2020 cites

Sadhana Lodh vs National Insurance Company Ltd. & Anr on 24 January, 2003

"23. In our opinion, therefore, the High Court rightly dismissed the petition on the ground that an efficacious remedy was available to the appellants under Section 17 of the Act. It is well settled that ordinarily relief under Articles 226/227 of the Constitution of India is not available if an efficacious alternative remedy is available to any aggrieved person. (See Sadhana Lodh v. National Insurance Co. Ltd.; Surya Dev Rai v. Ram Chander Rai and SBI v. Allied Chemical Laboratories.)"
Supreme Court of India Cites 6 - Cited by 1434 - Full Document

Surya Dev Rai vs Ram Chander Rai & Ors on 7 August, 2003

"23. In our opinion, therefore, the High Court rightly dismissed the petition on the ground that an efficacious remedy was available to the appellants under Section 17 of the Act. It is well settled that ordinarily relief under Articles 226/227 of the Constitution of India is not available if an efficacious alternative remedy is available to any aggrieved person. (See Sadhana Lodh v. National Insurance Co. Ltd.; Surya Dev Rai v. Ram Chander Rai and SBI v. Allied Chemical Laboratories.)"
Supreme Court of India Cites 25 - Cited by 3621 - R C Lahoti - Full Document
1