Crescent Dyes And Chemicals Ltd. vs Ram Naresh Tripathi on 16 December, 1992
In the case of Crescent Dyes and Chemicals Ltd.' (supra), the Hon'ble Supreme Court has held as follows 1993-I-LLJ-907 at p. 914:
Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 2 of 2 (0.18 seconds)
Peerless General Finance And ... vs Harikrishna Althal (Major) S/O. Late ... on 14 December, 2007
cites
Syndicate Bank vs Sri Venkatarama Murlidhar Shenoy on 20 January, 2004
Learned Counsel for the respondent placed reliance on the decision in the case of Syndicate Bank v. Sri Venkatarama Murlidhar Shenoy reported in 2004-III-LLJ-73 (Cal-DB) to contend that, since fair opportunity has not been given to the respondent and the relevant documents and the witnesses have not been produced in the enquiry, action taken by the appellant, is arbitrary and unsustainable. We do not find merit in the submission. In the instant case, appellant has examined the concerned witnesses and has produced the documents to establish the charge. Evidence of MWs.2 and 3 with regard to the charge levelled against the respondent is relevant, which has been considered by the enquiry officer and also by the Industrial Tribunal. The said decision, in the facts and circumstances of this case, has no application.
1