Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 4 of 4 (0.53 seconds)Hardie Trading Ltd. And Anr vs Addisons Paint And Chemicals Ltd on 12 September, 2003
In addition, he submits that while Section 134 of
the 1999 Act, protects the interests of the proprietor, under Section 57 of the
1999 Act in terms of Hardie Trading Ltd. (supra), the interest of the general
public also has to be kept in mind.
Shiv Shakti Coop. Housing Society, ... vs M/S. Swaraj Developers & Ors on 17 April, 2003
(iii) Shiv Shakti Co-operative Housing Society, Nagpur Vs. Swaraj
Developers12
9
(2003) 11 SCC 92
10
2014 (11) SCC 619, paragraph 27
11
2001 SCC OnLine Del 1536
12
(2003) 6 SCC 659
Signature Not Verified
Digitally Signed C.O. (COMM.IPD-TM) 179/2023 & connected matters Page 18 of 70
By:RAHUL
Signing Date:09.02.2024
19:16:40
Submissions of Mr. Rajshekhar Rao, ld. Counsel for the Respondent No. 1
in C.O. (COMM.IPD-TM) 778/2022, C.O. (COMM.IPD-TM) 782/2022,
C.O. (COMM.IPD-TM) 783/2022.
State Of Punjab And Anr vs Devans Modern Brewaries Ltd. And Anr on 20 November, 2003
28. Further, as held by the Supreme Court in the State of Punjab v. Devans
Modern Breweries Ltd.26, judicial discipline and propriety demands that a
decision made by a Coordinate Bench of the same High Court ought to be
respected and is considered to be binding. However, this is subject to the right
of a bench of equal authority to adopt a different view and refer the question
to a larger bench for consideration.
1