Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 5 of 5 (1.06 seconds)
State vs Anil Kumar Etc. on 25 February, 2015 cites

Nand Kishore vs State Of M.P on 7 July, 2011

iii) This Section deals with constructive criminal liability which provides that where a criminal act is done by several persons in furtherance of the common intention of all, each of such persons is liable for that act in the same manner as if it was done by him alone. If the common intention leads to the commission of the criminal offence charged, each one of the persons sharing the common intention is constructively liable for the criminal act done by one of them ....... Nand Kishore v State of M.P (2012) 1 SCC (Cri) 378: (2011) 12 SCC 120; Brathi v State of Punjab (1991) 1 SCC 519.
Supreme Court of India Cites 7 - Cited by 76 - S Kumar - Full Document

Brathi Alias Sukhdev Singh vs State Of Punjab on 31 October, 1990

iii) This Section deals with constructive criminal liability which provides that where a criminal act is done by several persons in furtherance of the common intention of all, each of such persons is liable for that act in the same manner as if it was done by him alone. If the common intention leads to the commission of the criminal offence charged, each one of the persons sharing the common intention is constructively liable for the criminal act done by one of them ....... Nand Kishore v State of M.P (2012) 1 SCC (Cri) 378: (2011) 12 SCC 120; Brathi v State of Punjab (1991) 1 SCC 519.
Supreme Court of India Cites 6 - Cited by 121 - K Singh - Full Document

Nallapati Sivaiah vs Sub-Divisional Officer, Guntur, A.P on 26 September, 2007

In view of the aforesaid discussion and laws laid down by the higher Courts, this Court is of the view that the prosecution has not been able to prove its case against the Accused beyond reasonable doubts. Accordingly, Anil Kumar, Vijay, Yogita , Kusum Gupta, Shakuntla Devi and Suman are acquitted of the charges levelled against them. Bail bond stands cancelled and Surety be discharged, if any. Documents, if any, be returned to the rightful person against receiving and after cancellation of endorsement, if any. Case property, if any, be confiscated to State and be destroyed after expiry of period of appeal. File be consigned to the Record Room after due compliance.
Supreme Court of India Cites 19 - Cited by 928 - B S Reddy - Full Document
1