Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 2 of 2 (0.19 seconds)
David Alias Balasaheb Sunderrao ... vs Kalpana Alias Mai Alias Vijayamala ... on 12 December, 1974 cites

Alfred Wilkinson vs Grace Emily Wilkinson on 4 April, 1923

Wilkinson v. Wilkinson . After dealing with the interpretation of Section 7 of the Indian Divorce Act and considering the words 'for the time being acts and gives relief, their Lordships have held that the above words were inserted to prevent the principles of law being rigidly fixed as at 1869. Of course that was a case considering the question of jurisdiction over people who were not residents in India.
Bombay High Court Cites 32 - Cited by 18 - Full Document

Anath Nath De vs Sm. Lajjabati Devi on 22 May, 1959

...in Anatk Nath v. Lajjabati Devi the allegation of the husband was that during the bourse of the negotiations of the marriage, the respondents represented to him that the wife Lajjabati Devi was of sound health and was not suffering from any disease. However, after the marriage it was discovered that she was suffering from tuberculosis from some time before the marriage was gone through. Though this case was decided also on the point that there was no allegation in the plaint that the alleged fraud was perpetrated at the time of the solemnization of the marriage, the Calcutta High Court observed that the marriage, according to Hindu Law, not being a contract, the consent at the first stage though obtained by fraud cannot affect the validity of the marriage.
Calcutta High Court Cites 9 - Cited by 8 - Full Document
1