Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 8 of 8 (0.25 seconds)
Mr S.A. Kumar vs Wyeth Ltd on 5 August, 2025 cites

M/S. Transport Corporation Of India Ltd vs M/S. Veljan Hydrair Ltd on 22 February, 2007

24. The ratio laid down by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in the case of Transport Corporation of India Limited supra is squarely applicable to the case on hand. Therefore, the trial Court has rightly held that the Section 10 of the Act is not applicable to the suit. The said finding arrived at by the trial Court needs no interference by this Court. Hence, the points are answered accordingly. There is no merit in the appeal and the same is liable to be dismissed.
Supreme Court of India Cites 8 - Cited by 65 - Full Document

The British And Foreign Marine ... vs The India General Navigation And ... on 12 July, 1910

26. We have already reproduced the provisions of Sections 6, 8 and 9 above. Section 6 enables the common carrier to limit his liability by a special contract. But the special contract will not absolve the carrier if the damage or loss to the goods, entrusted to him, has been caused by his own. negligence or criminal act or that of his agents or servants. In that situation, the carrier would be liable for the damage to or loss or non-delivery of goods. In this situation, if a suit is filed for recovery of damages, the burden of proof will not be on the owner or the plaintiff to show that the loss or as damage was caused owing to the negligence or criminal act of the carrier provided by Section 9. The carrier can escape his liability only if it is established that the loss or damage was due to an act of God or enemies of the State (or the enemies of the King, a phrase used by the Privy Council). The Calcutta decision in The British & Foreign Marine Insurance Co. vs. The Indian General Navigation and Railway Co.Ltd.
Calcutta High Court Cites 8 - Cited by 30 - Full Document
1