Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 2 of 2 (0.27 seconds)
Jayendrasingh Anirudhsingh Jadeja vs Gujarat State Machine Tools ... on 7 April, 2000 cites

Anandi Mukta Sadguru Shree Mukta ... vs V.R. Rudani & Ors on 21 April, 1989

In this context, Mr. Mishra has placed reliance upon the decisions in the matters of Shri Anandi Mukta Sadguru S.M.V.S.J.M.S Trust v. V.R Rudani, AIR 1989 SC 1607; of The Panthar Power Kamgar Sanghatana, Aurangabhad v. Y.C Jahalani, Executive Director & Ors., reported in 1998 (1) CLR 444; of H.M.T Limited v. Employees' State Insurance Corporation, reported in 1998 (1) LLN 922; of S.S Anand & Others v. Management of Mahatma Gandhi Vidya Peeta (Regd.) Bangalore & Another, reported in 1998 (3) LLN 259; of Firestone Employees Union v. State of Gujarat, reported in 1998 (II) CLR 799; and of Allahabad High Court in the matter of Harsh Vardhan Agarwal & Others v. Director General, Indian Council of Medical Research & Others, reported in 1998 Lab.IC 2544. In light of the aforesaid citations, Mr. Mishra submitted that writ can be issued against the private persons or Company while exercising powers under Art. 226 by the High Court, and therefore, this petition be entertained and reliefs prayed for by the petitioner be granted in terms of the settlement.
Supreme Court of India Cites 11 - Cited by 559 - K J Shetty - Full Document

Nani Gopal Sarkar And Others vs Heavy Engineering Corporation Ltd., ... on 21 March, 1990

In such a situation, the view taken by the Apex Court in the matter of Nani Gopal Sarkar & Ors. V. Heavy Engineering Corporation Limited, reported in AIR 1990 SC 1391, may be taken into consideration wherein it has been held that writ petition by employees alleging non-implementation of award by employer. No plea by employer that award is void or is not binding on them or they do not want to enforce it writ petition could not be dismissed on ground that award did not comply with the procedure under Sec. 10 when such stand was not taken by the employer. In the said case, learned Division Bench of Patna High Court has held that writ can be issued against the employer to implement the award passed by the Labour Court under the provisions of the I.D Act which is binding to the employer and it is final under the provisions of the I.D Act.
Supreme Court of India Cites 4 - Cited by 5 - N M Kasliwal - Full Document
1