Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 2 of 2 (0.24 seconds)

Budhan Choudhry And Other vs The State Of Bihar on 2 December, 1954

17. We are not oblivious of the settled legal position that compassionate appointment is an exception to general rule. As per the policy of compassionate appointment, State has already decided to consider claims of the married daughters (Clause 2.4) for compassionate appointment but such consideration was confined to such daughters who have no brothers. After the death of government servant, it is open to the spouse to decide and opt whether his/her son or daughter is best suited for compassionate appointment and take responsibilities towards family which were being discharged by the deceased government servant earlier. The offending clause which restricts such consideration only for such married daughter is subject matter of consideration and examination. The Constitution Bench of Supreme Court in Budhan Choudhry (Supra) held that substantive law, procedural law or even an action can be interfered with if it does not pass the "litmus test"
Supreme Court of India Cites 22 - Cited by 271 - Full Document

Dr. (Mrs.) Vijaya Manohar Arbat vs Kashi Rao Rajaram Sawai And Anr on 18 February, 1987

16. It is noteworthy that in the case of Vijaya Manohar (Supra), the Apex Court was talking about 'moral obligation' of children to maintain their parents. The Parliament in its wisdom introduced Signature Not Verified Signed by: ANINDYA SUNDAR MUKHOPADHYAY Signing time: 3/14/2024 11:30:27 AM 6 The Maintenance and Welfare of Parents and Senior Citizens Act, 2007. This Act places equal duty on both, sons and daughters to take care and maintain the parents. In view of this Act, the obligation to take care of parents assumes more importance and it is not only a "moral duty", it became a "statutory duty" of children as well.
Supreme Court of India Cites 10 - Cited by 16 - M M Dutt - Full Document
1