Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 3 of 3 (0.73 seconds)

Bhinka And Others vs Charan Singh on 24 April, 1959

15. The Gujarat High Court also took cognisance of the heading of Rule 86-A, which reads "conditions of use of amount available in the Electronic Credit Ledger". The Court held that on a plain reading of the heading itself, it was apparent that Rule 86-A could be invoked only if the amount was available in the Electronic Credit Ledger and not otherwise. The Court held that it was a settled rule of interpretation that the section heading or a marginal note could be relied upon to clear any doubt or ambiguity in the interpretation of the provision to discern the legislative intent. [vide Uttamdas Chela Sunder Das Vs SGPC6 and Bhinka & Ors. Vs Charan Singh7].
Supreme Court of India Cites 10 - Cited by 162 - Full Document

Pakala Narayana Swami vs Emperor on 19 January, 1939

v. North British Rly., (1881) 6 AC 114, p. 131 (HL) (LORD BLACKBURN); Vacher & Sons v. London Society of Compositors, (1913) AC 107: (1911-13) All ER Rep 241, p. 246 (HL) (LORD MACNAGHTEN); Corporation of the City of Victoria v. Bishop of Vancouver Island, AIR 1921 PC 240, p. 242 (LORD ATKINSON), Pakala Narayana Swami v. Emperor, AIR 1939 PC 47, p. 51 (LORD ATKINSON); Keshavananda Bharati v. State of Kerala, AIR 1973 SC 1461, p. 1538: (1973) 4 SCC 225; Nandini Satpathy v. P.L. Dani, AIR 1978 SC 1025, p. 1039: (1978) 2 SCC 424; Chandvarkar Sita Ratna Rao v. Ashalata S. Guram, (1986) 4 SCC 447, p. 476: AIR 1987 SC 117; Union of India v. Rajivkumar, (2003) 6 SCC 516, p. 526: AIR 2003 SC 2917.
Bombay High Court Cites 16 - Cited by 393 - Full Document
1