Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 12 (0.16 seconds)
Satish Gogia vs Neeraj Gupta on 4 April, 2009 cites

Dharmanand Pant vs State Of Uttar Pradesh on 30 January, 1956

Before I part with the order, I would like to mention that though in the light of Dharmanand's case (supra) and the fact that the revisionist has gone abroad by air and summons issued against him received back with the report that he was not at home but still the Ld. Trial Court should take care that the number of cases pending against revisionist are fixed for defence evidence on the some date for the convenience of the 9 revisionist. The learnred trial court should endeavour to record the examination of the revisionist on a single dry and the consent of parties concerned may be obtained for consolidation of cases for the purposes of defence evidence of revisionist, provided same evidence is to be produced by the revisionist in all these pending cases. The respopndent and its counsel should also cooperate with the court for recording of statement of revisionist on a single day.
Supreme Court of India Cites 8 - Cited by 12 - Full Document
1   2 Next