Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 2 of 2 (0.19 seconds)
South Bengal State Transport Corp vs Ashok Kumar Ghosh & Ors on 6 May, 2010 cites

State Of Punjab vs Vk Khanna & Ors on 30 November, 2000

12. Now, referring to the authority of this Court in the case of V.K. Khanna(supra), relied on by the High Court, same is clearly distinguishable. In the said case the chargesheet dated 24.4.1997 was issued to the delinquent employee who happened to be the Chief Secretary of the State and he was asked to submit his reply within 21 days but even before his reply, the Chief Minister made a statement on 27.4.1997 that a judge of the High Court would look into the charge against him. The aforesaid act of the Chief Minister coupled with other factors led this Court to conclude that the action was 11 actuated by bias. In the present case the facts are completely different.
Supreme Court of India Cites 8 - Cited by 308 - Full Document

Nyadar Singh & Anr vs Union Of India & Ors on 23 August, 1988

16. We may next consider whether the punishment is permissible in service jurisprudence. It is well settled that while an employee can be reverted to a lower post or service, he cannot be reverted to a post lower than the post in which he entered service (See: Nyadar Singh vs. Union of India - AIR 14 1988 SC 1979). Further it is also well settled that reversion to a lower post or service does not permit reversion to a post outside the cadre that is from regular post to a daily wage post. We are therefore of the view that the punishment inflicted on the delinquent employee not being one of the punishments enumerated in Regulation 36, is not permissible in law.
Supreme Court of India Cites 7 - Cited by 67 - M Rangnath - Full Document
1