Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 3 of 3 (0.20 seconds)
Basavaraj A.S. S/O. A Shivananda vs Sunder S/O. Premraj Jotawani on 31 July, 2018 cites

Pandurang Chandrakant Mhatre & Ors vs State Of Maharashtra on 8 October, 2009

In support of his submission, he placed reliance on the judgment in the case of Pandurang and others vs. :5: State through Police Sub-Inspector, Afzalpur reported in 2017(3) AKR 345 relating to Section 319 of Cr.P.C, wherein summoning of accused, the evidence on record must be sufficient to convict the accused and not merely to frame charge or to take cognizance and mere fact that there is some evidence, which would be sufficient to frame charge, is not sufficient material to invoke extraordinary power under Section 319 of Cr.P.C. Whereas, in this petition, notice has been issued on an application filed under Section 319 of Cr.P.C. to the proposed accused No.5/petitioner herein, the same has been challenged. On all these grounds urged, the learned counsel for the petitioner seeks to set aside the order passed on an application filed under Section 319 of Cr.P.C. to arraigned him as accused No.5.
Supreme Court of India Cites 65 - Cited by 146 - R M Lodha - Full Document

Hardeep Singh vs State Of Punjab & Ors on 10 January, 2014

In the instant case, on filing an application under Section 319 of Cr.P.C. notice has been issued and the same has been challenged under this petition filed under Section 482 of Cr.P.C. The power of the Court under Section 319 of Cr.P.C. is discretionary and extraordinary power vested with the Courts, it is to be exercised sparingly and only in those cases where the circumstances so warrant as the decision of the Hon'ble Apex Court in Hardeep Singh's case stated supra, the same is also referred in the reliance placed by the respondent counsel in support of his contention.
Supreme Court of India Cites 114 - Cited by 1591 - B S Chauhan - Full Document

Yogendra Yadav & Ors. vs State Of Bihar & Anr on 23 August, 2013

In Jogendra Yadav's case notice was issued on filing of application under Section 319 of Cr.P.C. that he should not be added as an additional accused, after giving opportunity to consider the said application on merits for involvement of the proposed person being an accused. :8: But, in the aforesaid case of Jogendra Yadav, it discloses that, prior notice has been issued to the person sought to be added as an additional accused before including them as parties in the proceedings.
Patna High Court - Orders Cites 4 - Cited by 13 - S Pandey - Full Document
1