Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 1 of 1 (0.20 seconds)

Mohd Muslim @ Hussain vs State (Nct Of Delhi) on 28 March, 2023

(Emphasis Supplied) In the case of Mohd. Muslim @ Hussain (Supra) it has been propounded that at the stage of hearing a bail application under Section 439 Cr.P.C., although it is not possible to make a definite opinion that they are not guilty of the alleged crime but for the limited purpose for the justifiable disposal of the bail applications, a tentative opinion can be formed that the material brought on record is not sufficient enough to attract the embargo contained under Section 37 of the NDPS Act. Though specific arguments have not been conveyed but looking to the fact that the accused is in custody, this court feels that the accused are not (Downloaded on 04/08/2025 at 09:30:36 PM) [2025:RJ-JD:33858] (12 of 12) [CRLMB-5225/2025] supposed to establish a case in support of his innocence rather his detention is required to be justified at the instance of the prosecution, therefore, this court went deep into the facts of the case and the manner in which the entire proceedings have been undertaken. If other surrounding factors align in consonance with the statutory stipulations, the personal liberty of an individual can not encroached upon by keeping him behind the bars for an indefinite period of time pending trial. In view of the above, it is deemed suitable to grant the benefit of bail to the petitioner.
Supreme Court - Daily Orders Cites 33 - Cited by 489 - S R Bhat - Full Document
1