Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 8 of 8 (0.02 seconds)Section 302 in The Indian Penal Code, 1860 [Entire Act]
Section 201 in The Indian Penal Code, 1860 [Entire Act]
Section 120B in The Indian Penal Code, 1860 [Entire Act]
Hanumant vs The State Of Madhya ... on 23 January, 1952
28. The principles enunciated in Hanumant vs.
State of M.P., (1952) 2 SCC 71; Tufail vs. State of U.P.,
(1969) 3 SCC 198 and Sharad Birdichand Sarda vs.
State of Maharashtra, (1984) 4 SCC 116 have now
become too well known to be extracted here.
Sharad Birdhichand Sarda vs State Of Maharashtra on 17 July, 1984
28. The principles enunciated in Hanumant vs.
State of M.P., (1952) 2 SCC 71; Tufail vs. State of U.P.,
(1969) 3 SCC 198 and Sharad Birdichand Sarda vs.
State of Maharashtra, (1984) 4 SCC 116 have now
become too well known to be extracted here.
Ram Niwas vs The State Of Haryana on 11 August, 2022
29. However, it needs to be reiterated that
circumstances relied upon by the prosecution must be
established. That an occurrence may have taken place is no
way to proceed in the matter. The Courts, in a very apt
manner have drawn distinction between "may be proved" and
"must be proved". Both the expressions do not differ from
each other only grammatically, but in their import and
consequences as well. [also refer to Ram Niwas vs. State of
Haryana, (2022) 15 SCC 306 ; Ballu & Anr. vs. State of
Madhya Pradesh, (2024) SCC Online SC 481 and Parubai
vs. State of Maharashtra, (2021) 18 SCC 353 ].
Ballu @ Bhagwati And Anr. vs The State Of M.P, on 20 August, 2018
29. However, it needs to be reiterated that
circumstances relied upon by the prosecution must be
established. That an occurrence may have taken place is no
way to proceed in the matter. The Courts, in a very apt
manner have drawn distinction between "may be proved" and
"must be proved". Both the expressions do not differ from
each other only grammatically, but in their import and
consequences as well. [also refer to Ram Niwas vs. State of
Haryana, (2022) 15 SCC 306 ; Ballu & Anr. vs. State of
Madhya Pradesh, (2024) SCC Online SC 481 and Parubai
vs. State of Maharashtra, (2021) 18 SCC 353 ].
1