M.S. Jaggi vs Subaschandra Mohapatra on 27 April, 1977
5. Learned Counsel for the petitioner relied upon the judgments reported as V. Parakashan v. K.P. Pankajakshan and Anr. 1985 Crl.L.J. 951; Sharif Mohammed v. State of H.P. 2003 Crl.L.J. 2911; M.S. Jaggi v. S. Mohapatra 1977 Crl.L.J. 1902 and submitted that although the order under Section 451 is by way of a temporary arrangement, during the pendency of enquiry or trial, nevertheless, the Court will have to consider some aspects of the merits and cannot act in an injudicious manner while dealing with property.