Jaipur Zila Sahakari Bhoomi Vikas Bank ... vs Ram Gopal Sharma & Ors on 17 January, 2002
NC: 2023:KHC-K:5402
WP No. 207355 of 2017 &
Connected Matters
obtained from the Court seized of the industrial
dispute. Apart from discharge or dismissal, if
any other punishment is levied/imposed, then
no such permission is required to be obtained.
In the present batch of matters, it is not in all
of them that the workman has been dismissed
from service. The workmen have been
dismissed from service only in WP
No.200010/2014 and WP No.203006/2014.
Thus, it is only in those cases that such
permission was required to be obtained and
compliance with the proviso to Clause-B of sub-
section (2) of Section 33 of I.D.Act is required
to be made. Thus, as held by the Hon'ble Apex
Court in Jaipur Zila Sahakari Bhoomi Vikas
Bank Ltd's case, the sanction not having been
obtained, dismissal would be non-est and is
required to be set aside.