Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 2 of 2 (0.29 seconds)
S.Rajendran vs The Secretary on 5 March, 2018 cites

Dr. Chandra Prakash & Ors vs State Of U.P. & Anr on 4 December, 2002

Their Lordships rendered the case of Chandra Prakash and others v. State of U.P. and another, reported in [JT 2002 (3) SC 493], held that the doctrine of binding precedent is of utmost importance in the administration of our judicial system. It promotes certainty and consistency in judicial decisions. Judicial consistency promotes confidence in the system, therefore, there is this need for consistency in the enunciation of legal principles in the decisions of this Court.
Supreme Court of India Cites 5 - Cited by 141 - R Pal - Full Document

Union Of India & Anr vs Delhi High Court Bar Association & Ors on 14 March, 2002

It may be noted here that the Constitution Bench in Madras Bar Association v. Union of India and another [JT 2015(5)SC 33]has clearly stated that the prior Constitution Bench judgment in Union of India v. Madras Bar Association [JT 2010 (5) SC 553]is a binding precedent. Be it clarified, the issues that were put to rest in the earlier Constitution Bench judgment were treated as precedents by latter Constitution Bench.
Supreme Court of India Cites 52 - Cited by 290 - Full Document
1