Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 2 of 2 (0.22 seconds)
Kamdhenu Ltd vs The Registrar Of Trade Marks on 6 July, 2023 cites

M/S Kamdhenu Ispat Ltd (Oa/22/12 Tm Kol) vs M/S Pragati Primary Milk Producers Co ... on 18 May, 2023

Another reference was made of the Hon'ble High court of Delhi in the matter of Kamdhenu Ispat Limited vs. Pragati Primary Milk Products; CS (OS) 2564 of 2015 wherein an ad interim injection was allowed in favour of the plaintiff but the Hon'ble court has not observed Kamdhenu as a well-known trademark although a reference as such was made in the submissions by the Ld. Counsel for the plaintiff.
Calcutta High Court Cites 1 - Cited by 1 - R K Kapur - Full Document

Tata Sia Airlines Limited vs Union Of India on 25 May, 2023

In Tata Sia Airlines Ltd. v. Union of India (2023:DHC:3659), Justice Jyoti Singh of this Court has interpreted the interplay between Section 11 of the 1999 Act and Rule 124 of the 2017 Rules. This Court observed that Rule 124(5) of the 2017 Rules does not create a distinction between a well-known trade mark declared by the Court, or determined by the Registrar. In both scenarios, the procedures outlined are the same. Moreover, the Court noted that the purpose of Rule 124 of the 2017 Rules was to streamline the procedure, and bring uniformity in declaration of well- known trademarks. The Court observed as follows:
Delhi High Court Cites 33 - Cited by 3 - J Singh - Full Document
1