Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 2 of 2 (0.27 seconds)
State Of Punjab vs Sanjeev Kumar Arora on 28 January, 2025 cites

Vipan Kumar Dhir vs The State Of Punjab on 4 October, 2021

20. As per the settled proposition of law, it is well established principle that once bail has been granted, it would require cogent and overwhelming circumstances for its cancellation. However, at the same time, equally important is to note that bail can be revoked by the Superior Court, if the Court granting bail has ignored the relevant material available on record as has been observed by Hon'ble Supreme Court in Vipin Kumar Dhir Vs. State of Punjab, 2021 SCC Online SSC 854.
Supreme Court of India Cites 5 - Cited by 39 - S Kant - Full Document

Dataram Singh vs The State Of Uttar Pradesh on 6 February, 2018

These principles have been reiterated by another two Judge Bench decision in Central Bureau of Investigation, Hyderabad v Subramani Gopalakrishnan (2011) 5 SCC 296 and more recently in Dataram Singh v State of Uttar Pradesh (2018) 3 SCC 22 "It is also relevant to note that there is difference between yardsticks for cancellation of bail and appeal against the order granting bail. Very cogent and overwhelming circumstances are necessary for an order directing the cancellation of bail already granted. Generally speaking, the grounds for cancellation of bail are, interference or attempt to interfere with the due course of administration of justice or evasion or attempt to evade the due course of justice or abuse of the concessions granted to the accused in any manner. These are all only few illustrative materials. The satisfaction of the Court on the basis of the materials placed on record of the possibility of the accused absconding is another reason justifying the cancellation of bail. In other words, bail once granted should not be cancelled in a mechanical manner without Page 20 of 31 20 of 31 ::: Downloaded on - 30-01-2025 06:39:35 ::: Neutral Citation No:=2025:PHHC:012959 CRM-M-55801-2024 2025:PHHC: 012959 CRM-M-55802-2024 2025:PHHC: 012959 CRR-2447-2024 2025:PHHC: 012959 CRM-M-26362-2023 2025:PHHC: 012959 CRM-M-25524-2024 2025:PHHC: 012962 considering whether any supervening circumstances have rendered it no longer conducive to a fair trial to allow the accused to retain his freedom by enjoying the concession of bail during the trial."
Supreme Court of India Cites 12 - Cited by 35378 - M B Lokur - Full Document
1