Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 2 of 2 (0.18 seconds)
The Oriental Insurance Company Limited vs Meena Variyal & Ors on 2 April, 2007 cites

New India Assurance Co., Shimla vs Kamla And Ors on 27 March, 2001

That this was the object was reiterated in New India Assurance Co. Shimla Vs. Kamla & Ors. [(2001) 4 S.C.C. 342], wherein it was stated that the raison d'etre for the legislature making it prohibitory for motor vehicles being used in public places without covering third-party risks by a policy of insurance is to protect the members of the community who become sufferers on account of accidents arising from the use of motor vehicles. The object of Chapter XI has thus always been recognised as one intended to protect third parties as understood in the context of the Act unless of course there is a special contract in respect of protection to others.
Supreme Court of India Cites 13 - Cited by 649 - Full Document
1