Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 6 of 6 (0.45 seconds)

Swamy Shraddananda@Murali Monahar ... vs State Of Karnataka on 22 July, 2008

28. In Swamy Shraddananda vs. State of Karnataka, (2008)  13  SCC  767  :  (AIR  2008   SC   3040), even  while   setting   aside  the  sentence of death penalty and awarding life imprisonment in order  to serve the ends of justice, the Court ordered that the appellant  should   not   be   released   from   the   prison   till   the   end   of   his   life.
Supreme Court of India Cites 52 - Cited by 270 - A Alam - Full Document

Sri. Sujit Biswas vs State Of Assam on 28 May, 2013

[15.2] Applying law laid down by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in  the aforesaid decision to the facts of the case on hand, we are of the  opinion that the learned trial Court has materially erred in convicting  the original accused for the offences punishable under Section 202 r/w  Section   34   of   the   IPC   as   the   prosecution   has   failed   to   prove   beyond  doubt the guilt of the accused. Under the circumstances even by giving  benefit   of   doubt   as   it   is   the   case   of   circumstantial   evidence   and   the  prosecution has failed to complete the chain of circumstances. Under the  circumstances,   appeal   preferred   by   the   original   accused   No.2   being  Criminal   Appeal   No.   1281   of   2011   deserves   to   be   allowed   and   the  impugned judgment and order passed by the learned trial Court in so far  as   convicting   the   original   accused   No.2   for   the   offences   punishable  under Section 201 r/w Section 34 of the IPC deserves to be quashed and  set aside and the accused No.2­ Pankaj Sodha is to be acquitted for the  charges, for which, he has been convicted.
Supreme Court of India Cites 27 - Cited by 555 - B S Chauhan - Full Document
1