Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 4 of 4 (0.31 seconds)
The State Of Karnataka Represented vs Mr. Rajashekar on 24 January, 2023 cites

State Of Kerala vs V. Padmanabhan Nair on 14 July, 1999

8.11. It is necessary to refer the decision reported in (1999) 5 SCC 690 in the State of Kerala Vs. Padmanabh Nair. In the said case the Hon'ble Supreme Court in para- 6 to 8 of the judgment held that the accused facing the prosecution for the offence under the PC Act cannot claim immunity on the ground of want of sanction, if he ceased to be a public servant on the date when the court took cognizance of the offence.
Supreme Court of India Cites 16 - Cited by 152 - Full Document

Kali Ram vs State Of Himachal Pradesh on 24 September, 1973

In the judgment relied by the accused reported in AIR 1973 SC 2773 in the case of Kali Ram vs State in para 25 the Hon'ble Supreme Court held that the reasonable doubt regarding guilt of the accused, the accused must have the benefit of that doubt, but the doubt should be reasonable and not based on surmises, conjectures or fanciful considerations. Therefore the attempt made by the 35 Spl.C.C.160/2018 accused to dislodge Ex. P-29 report and evidence of Pw- 7 is failed.
Supreme Court of India Cites 24 - Cited by 946 - H R Khanna - Full Document

Sonu @ Amar vs State Of Haryana on 18 July, 2017

In this connection referred the decision reported in (2017) 8 SCC 570 Sonu alias Amar vs State of Haryana. In the said case the Hon'ble Supreme Court held that objection relating to or method of proof has to be raised at the time of marking of the document. Hence the objection raised by the accused in the later stage during the final argument is untenable. Therefore from the aforesaid facts, reasons and circumstances the prosecution has proved the telephonic conversation between Pw-10 and the accused. Ex.P-21 and 23 are the circumstantial and corroborative evidence produced 49 Spl.C.C.160/2018 to prove the demand for bribe made by the accused No.1 and 2 .
Supreme Court of India Cites 36 - Cited by 164 - L N Rao - Full Document

Panyala Parsharam Reddy vs The State Of Telangana on 27 April, 2022

Vii) (2011) 12 SCC 294 in P. Parusharami Reddy Vs State the complainant was driven out of room when he approached the accused, the treated currency notes were thrown by the accused was not recovered and hence the Hon'ble Supreme Court held that convicting the accused on the sole ground of sodium carbonate turned to pink colour is not sufficient. In the above referred decisions the prosecution has failed to prove the demand by the accused and hence the Hon'ble court held that mere recovery without proof of demand would not attract the offence and mere recovery of tainted money is not sufficient to convict the 54 Spl.C.C.160/2018 accused. The decisions relied has no bearing on the facts and circumstances of the case as in the case on hand the demand and acceptance of the bribe are proved by the prosecution.
Telangana High Court Cites 2 - Cited by 1 - K L Goud - Full Document
1