Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 20 (0.05 seconds)
Kantilal Narshibhai Rathod vs Natvarlal Mavjibhai on 8 August, 2023 cites

Basawaraj vs The Special Land Acquisition Officer on 27 May, 2008

In the case of Basawaraj (supra), it is observed and held by this Court that the discretion to condone the delay has to be exercised judiciously based on facts and circumstances of each case. It is further observed that the expression "sufficient cause" cannot be liberally interpreted if negligence, inaction or lack of bona fides is attributed to the party. It is further observed that even though limitation may harshly affect rights of a party but it has to be applied with all its rigour when prescribed by statute. It is further observed that in case a party has acted with negligence, lack of bona fides or there is inaction then there cannot be any justified ground for condoning the delay even by imposing conditions. It is observed that each application for condonation of delay has to be decided within the framework laid down by this Court. It is further observed that if courts start condoning delay where no sufficient cause is made out by imposing conditions then that would amount to violation of statutory principles and showing utter disregard to legislature.
Karnataka High Court Cites 0 - Cited by 297 - H G Ramesh - Full Document

Majji Sannemma @ Sanyasirao vs Reddy Sridevi on 16 December, 2021

17. Yet in another decision of the Apex Court in the case of Majji Sannemma @ Sanyasirao vs. Reddy Sridevi (supra), while considering various judgments and applying the principle, allowed the appeal by quashing and setting aside the order of the High Court whereby, delay of 1011 days caused in preferring the Second Appeal, was condoned. The Apex Court, noted that the High Court was not at all justified in exercising its discretion while condoning such a huge delay, as the reasoning given were not germane.
Supreme Court of India Cites 4 - Cited by 261 - M R Shah - Full Document

Arjun Singh vs Mohindra Kumar & Ors on 13 December, 1963

In Arjun Singh v. Mohindra Kumar, AIR 1964 SC 993 this Court explained the difference between a "good cause" and a "sufficient cause" and observed that every "sufficient cause" is Page 18 of 25 Downloaded on : Sun Sep 17 00:44:37 IST 2023 NEUTRAL CITATION C/CRA/205/2013 JUDGMENT DATED: 08/08/2023 undefined a good cause and vice versa. However, if any difference exists it can only be that the requirement of good cause is complied with on a lesser degree of proof that that of "sufficient cause".
Supreme Court of India Cites 10 - Cited by 672 - N R Ayyangar - Full Document
1   2 Next