Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 3 of 3 (0.38 seconds)

Synchron Machine Tools P. Ltd. And ... vs U.M. Suresh Rao on 17 September, 1992

281. Appellant places their reliance on Hind Overseas vs. Ragunath Prasad Jhunjhunwala & Ors [AIR 1976 SC565 para 33] and Synchron Machine Tools P. Ltd. & Ors. vs. U.M. Suresh Rao [1994] 79 CompCas 868 (Kar) para 31, 180, 190] which holds that principles applicable in cases of dissolution of partnership can be invoked for a company that is being CA (AT) No. 65 of 2019 and TA No. 01 of 2023 143 of 147 operated in the style of a partnership. Herein the principles could have been applied as this private limited company was earlier partnership but is still being run like a family concern. Principle of dissolution of partnership applies to companies either on the ground of complete deadlock or on the ground of being domestic or family companies.
Karnataka High Court Cites 43 - Cited by 17 - Full Document

Mr H J Siwani vs Dr R P Shankar on 16 January, 2017

In any event, it is submitted that the Hon'ble High Court of Karnataka in Mr H.J. Siwani and Anr. v. Dr R.P. Shankar and Ors. (ILR 2016 Kar 1571) has held a common appeal under Order XLIII Rule 1(r) of CPC against orders in several interlocutory applications is maintainable as there is no prohibition to present such a common appeal. Similarly, there is no prohibition under the Act or NCLAT Rules, 2016, to present such a common appeal.
Karnataka High Court Cites 2 - Cited by 0 - K N Phaneendra - Full Document

Sri.Krishnappa And Ors vs Smt.Shalini Rajneesh (I.A.S) & Anr on 6 August, 2018

181. Written Family Settlement Agreement Compulsorily Requires Registration: Krishnappa & Ors. Vs. Smt. Aswathamma R.S.A. No. 87/2010, Hon'ble High Court of Karnataka: Appeal liable to be dismissed in limine; as appellant failed to establish, at the time when the appeal was presented, that the affairs of the company were being conducted in a manner oppressive: Sangramsinh P. Gaekwad and Ors. Vs. Shantadhvi P. Gaekwad (Dead) Thr. Lrs.
Karnataka High Court Cites 1 - Cited by 0 - Full Document
1