Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 1 of 1 (0.21 seconds)

Tilkeshwar Singh And Others vs The State Of Bihar on 8 December, 1955

13. The failure to record the statement of the witness under section 161 of the Code, does not render the evidence of the witness inadmissible, as is held by the Hon'ble Apex Court in Tilkeshwar Singh vs. State of Bihar, AIR 1956 SC 238 but such failure may certainly effect the evidentiary value of the evidence. The prejudice caused to the accused is obvious. It would be for the Court to determine in the facts of the case the impact of the prejudice on the fate of the prosecution. It is neither necessary nor possible to device and apply a ::: Uploaded on - 30/07/2019 ::: Downloaded on - 31/07/2019 03:23:13 ::: 15 apeal586.17 straight jacket formula with any degree of precision. However, I have no doubt in my mind that if the statements of a material witness is not recorded under section 161 of the Code, the evidence of such witness would have to be scrutinized minutely with extreme caution and unless the evidence is of extremely sterling quality corroboration would be necessary for the Court to attach any significant weight to such evidence.
Supreme Court of India Cites 20 - Cited by 15 - V Bose - Full Document
1