Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 7 of 7 (0.35 seconds)
The Oriental Fire And General Insurance ... vs Matta Chandra Rao And Anr. on 18 October, 1986 cites

Channappa Chanavirappa Katti And Anr. vs Laxman Bhimappa Bajantri And Ors. on 26 June, 1978

33. (i) The owner of the goods: The owner of the goods which are transported in the goods vehicle, teas been treated by several High Courts (except the Madras and the Punjab High Courts and the Madhya Pradesh and Calcutta High Courts) as a person carried for 'reward'. The Bombay High Court in Nasibdar v. Adhia Company , the Rajasthan High Court in Santra Bat v. Prahlad, (supra), the Karnataka High Court in Channppa v. Laxman AIR 1979 Karnataka 93, United India Insurance Co. Ltd. v. Gangamma AIR 1982 Karnataka 261, the Kerala High Court in State Insurance Officer Trivandrum v. Sosamma , the Allahabad High Court in Abdul Razak v. Smt. Sharyfunnisa AIR 1983 Allahabad 400, have held that the owner of the goods is covered by the Act policy and the Insurance Company is liable.
Karnataka High Court Cites 15 - Cited by 17 - Full Document

United India Insurance Co. Ltd. vs Gangamma And Anr. Etc. on 14 August, 1981

33. (i) The owner of the goods: The owner of the goods which are transported in the goods vehicle, teas been treated by several High Courts (except the Madras and the Punjab High Courts and the Madhya Pradesh and Calcutta High Courts) as a person carried for 'reward'. The Bombay High Court in Nasibdar v. Adhia Company , the Rajasthan High Court in Santra Bat v. Prahlad, (supra), the Karnataka High Court in Channppa v. Laxman AIR 1979 Karnataka 93, United India Insurance Co. Ltd. v. Gangamma AIR 1982 Karnataka 261, the Kerala High Court in State Insurance Officer Trivandrum v. Sosamma , the Allahabad High Court in Abdul Razak v. Smt. Sharyfunnisa AIR 1983 Allahabad 400, have held that the owner of the goods is covered by the Act policy and the Insurance Company is liable.
Karnataka High Court Cites 1 - Cited by 14 - K J Shetty - Full Document

State Insurance Department, State ... vs Sosamma Mani And Ors. on 12 July, 1978

33. (i) The owner of the goods: The owner of the goods which are transported in the goods vehicle, teas been treated by several High Courts (except the Madras and the Punjab High Courts and the Madhya Pradesh and Calcutta High Courts) as a person carried for 'reward'. The Bombay High Court in Nasibdar v. Adhia Company , the Rajasthan High Court in Santra Bat v. Prahlad, (supra), the Karnataka High Court in Channppa v. Laxman AIR 1979 Karnataka 93, United India Insurance Co. Ltd. v. Gangamma AIR 1982 Karnataka 261, the Kerala High Court in State Insurance Officer Trivandrum v. Sosamma , the Allahabad High Court in Abdul Razak v. Smt. Sharyfunnisa AIR 1983 Allahabad 400, have held that the owner of the goods is covered by the Act policy and the Insurance Company is liable.
Kerala High Court Cites 8 - Cited by 20 - V B Eradi - Full Document

Abdul Razzak vs Smt. Sharifunnisa And Ors. on 21 September, 1982

33. (i) The owner of the goods: The owner of the goods which are transported in the goods vehicle, teas been treated by several High Courts (except the Madras and the Punjab High Courts and the Madhya Pradesh and Calcutta High Courts) as a person carried for 'reward'. The Bombay High Court in Nasibdar v. Adhia Company , the Rajasthan High Court in Santra Bat v. Prahlad, (supra), the Karnataka High Court in Channppa v. Laxman AIR 1979 Karnataka 93, United India Insurance Co. Ltd. v. Gangamma AIR 1982 Karnataka 261, the Kerala High Court in State Insurance Officer Trivandrum v. Sosamma , the Allahabad High Court in Abdul Razak v. Smt. Sharyfunnisa AIR 1983 Allahabad 400, have held that the owner of the goods is covered by the Act policy and the Insurance Company is liable.
Allahabad High Court Cites 35 - Cited by 14 - K N Singh - Full Document

The Common Wealth Assurance Co. Ltd., ... vs V.P. Rahim Khan Sahib And Ors. on 29 January, 1971

36. However, the Madras High Court in Common Wealth Assurance Co. v. P. Rahim Khan and in South India Insurance Co. v. Subramaniam and the Punjab Full Bench in O.F. and G, Insurance Co. v. G. Kaur (FB) the Madhya Pradesh High Court in South India Insurance Co. v. Heera Bat 1967 ACJ 65 and the Calcutta High Court in India Mutual G. Insurance Society v. Manzoor Ashan , have held that the owner of the goods carried is not covered by Clause (ii) of the proviso to Section 95(1)(b) and that unless there is a special contract the Company is not liable.
Madras High Court Cites 6 - Cited by 26 - Full Document

Indian Mutual General Insurance ... vs Manzoor Ashan And Ors. on 9 April, 1976

36. However, the Madras High Court in Common Wealth Assurance Co. v. P. Rahim Khan and in South India Insurance Co. v. Subramaniam and the Punjab Full Bench in O.F. and G, Insurance Co. v. G. Kaur (FB) the Madhya Pradesh High Court in South India Insurance Co. v. Heera Bat 1967 ACJ 65 and the Calcutta High Court in India Mutual G. Insurance Society v. Manzoor Ashan , have held that the owner of the goods carried is not covered by Clause (ii) of the proviso to Section 95(1)(b) and that unless there is a special contract the Company is not liable.
Calcutta High Court Cites 7 - Cited by 12 - Full Document
1