cites: 33388 benchid: r-pal

1 - 2 of 2 (0.45 seconds)

Chartered Financial Analysis ... vs The Institute Of Chartered Financial ... on 5 April, 2010 cites

State Of Haryana vs State Of Punjab And Anr on 15 January, 2002

37. Challenge to the validity of a statute must be pleaded and clearly laid out in the grounds of the pleadings and if not, the same must be rejected in limine. Counsel referred to State of Haryana Vs. State of Punjab,(2004) 12 SCC 673 wherein it was observed as under :

Supreme Court of India Cites 26 - Cited by 139 - R Pal - Full Document

Mayar (H.K.) Ltd. & Ors vs Owners & Parties, Vessel M.V. Fortune ... on 30 January, 2006

49. Further, the question of whether a plaint is barred by any law or is not maintainable due to want of cause of action can only be determined on the basis of a meaningful and close reading of the plaint. The defence of the defendants is not to be looked into at this stage (Mayar (H.K.) Ltd. Vs. Owners & Parties, Vessel M.V. Fortune Express, (2006) 3 SCC 100 and Manmohan Singhy Chawla Vs. Rajesh Berry & Anr., 2009 (3) AD (Delhi) 259).

Supreme Court of India Cites 21 - Cited by 558 - P P Naolekar - Full Document

Search Results Page

Refine Search

Search Results

State Of Haryana vs State Of Punjab And Anr on 15 January, 2002

Mayar (H.K.) Ltd. & Ors vs Owners & Parties, Vessel M.V. Fortune ... on 30 January, 2006