Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 1 of 1 (0.22 seconds)

Aneeta Hada vs M/S Godfather Travels & Tours Pvt.Ltd on 27 April, 2012

59. In view of our aforesaid analysis, we arrive at the irresistible conclusion that for maintaining the prosecution under Section 141 of the Act, arraigning of a company as an accused is imperative. The other categories of offenders can only be brought in the dragnet on the touchstone of vicarious liability as the same has been stipulated in the provision itself. We say so on the basis of the ratio laid down in C.V. Parekh [(1970) 3 SCC 491: 1971 SCC (Cri) 97] ::: Downloaded on - 07/04/2026 20:30:14 :::CIS 22 2026:HHC:10091 which is a three-judge Bench decision. Thus, the view expressed in Sheoratan Agarwal [(1984) 4 SCC 352: 1984 SCC (Cri) 620] does not correctly lay down the law and, accordingly, is hereby overruled. The decision .
Supreme Court of India Cites 61 - Cited by 350 - D Misra - Full Document
1