Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 8 of 8 (0.18 seconds)
Smt. Tara Wati vs Shri Bhagwan Singh on 1 September, 2011 cites

Sheela & Ors vs Firm Prahlad Rai Prem Prakash on 4 March, 2002

In Sheela & Ors. Vs. Prahlad Rai Prem Prakash, AIR 2002 SC 1264, it was held that in a landlord tenant dispute, the owner is one who has better rights then that of the tenant and it is not incumbent upon the E­53/11 Page 9/14 petitioner to prove beyond shadow of doubt that he is the owner of the property. The meaning of the word 'owner' vis­a­vis tenant is that ownership is something more than a tenant. The respondent has not stated as to who else is a owner if the petitioner is not the owner of the tenanted premises. Hence, the bald denial of the ownership of the petitioner by the respondent is without any merits. Even otherwise, Section 116 of Indian Evidence Act estops the tenant of immovable property from denying the title of his landlord so long as he remains in possession. Hence, the defence raised by the respondent is rejected being without any merits.
Supreme Court of India Cites 19 - Cited by 216 - R C Lahoti - Full Document

Niranjan Lal Ram Chandra vs Ram Swarup Bhagwan Singh And Anr. on 29 March, 1950

At present, the petitioner is having 13 family members and only four rooms are available for her and her entire family members and the petitioner is presently living in open space/ baramda. The petitioner and her family members are not having any other property except the abovesaid property where she is presently residing with her family members. The petitioner requires the tenanted premises for her own bonafide requirement for residential purposes and the petitioner is no more interested to keep the respondent as tenant in the suit property. It has further been submitted that the husband of the petitioner had filed the eviction petition u/S. 14(1)(c) and (e) of the DRC Act against the respondent titled as Ram Azor Vs. Bhagwan Singh vide petition no. E­249/09 in the Court of Sh. Parveen Singh, the then Ld. ARC (NE), Karkardooma Courts, Delhi but after the death of her husband, the petitioner herein had withdrawn the abovesaid petition on 01.04.2011. A prayer has been made for passing eviction order in respect of the tenanted room/ shop.
Allahabad High Court Cites 0 - Cited by 7 - Full Document
1