State Of H.P. And Ors vs Gujarat Ambuja Cement Ltd. And Anr on 18 July, 2005
5. The Supreme Court in the matter of State of H.P. and
others v. Gujrat Ambuja Cement and another1 observed as
under:
Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 10 of 15 (0.26 seconds)Veerappa Pillai vs Raman & Raman Ltd. And Others on 17 March, 1952
In G.Verappa Pillai v. Raman & Raman Ltd.,
CCE v. Dunlop India Ltd., Ramendra Kishore
Biswas v. State of Tripura, Shiv Gonda Anna
Patil v. State of Maharashtra, C.A. Abraham v.
I.T.O, Titaghur Paper Mills Co. Ltd. v. State
of Orissa, H.B.Gandhi v. Gopinath & Sons,
Whirlpool Corpn. V. Registrar of Trademarks,
Tin Plate Co. of India Ltd. v. State of Bihar,
Sheela Devi v. Jaspal Singh, and Punjab
National Bank v. O.C.Krishnan, this Court had
held that where hierarchy of appeals is
provided by the statute, party must exhaust
the statutory remedy before resorting to writ
jurisdiction."
Sri Ramendra Kishore Biswas vs State Of Tripura And Ors on 4 December, 1998
In G.Verappa Pillai v. Raman & Raman Ltd.,
CCE v. Dunlop India Ltd., Ramendra Kishore
Biswas v. State of Tripura, Shiv Gonda Anna
Patil v. State of Maharashtra, C.A. Abraham v.
I.T.O, Titaghur Paper Mills Co. Ltd. v. State
of Orissa, H.B.Gandhi v. Gopinath & Sons,
Whirlpool Corpn. V. Registrar of Trademarks,
Tin Plate Co. of India Ltd. v. State of Bihar,
Sheela Devi v. Jaspal Singh, and Punjab
National Bank v. O.C.Krishnan, this Court had
held that where hierarchy of appeals is
provided by the statute, party must exhaust
the statutory remedy before resorting to writ
jurisdiction."
C. A. Abraham, Uppoottil, Kottayam vs The Income-Tax Officer, Kottayam And ... on 29 November, 1960
In G.Verappa Pillai v. Raman & Raman Ltd.,
CCE v. Dunlop India Ltd., Ramendra Kishore
Biswas v. State of Tripura, Shiv Gonda Anna
Patil v. State of Maharashtra, C.A. Abraham v.
I.T.O, Titaghur Paper Mills Co. Ltd. v. State
of Orissa, H.B.Gandhi v. Gopinath & Sons,
Whirlpool Corpn. V. Registrar of Trademarks,
Tin Plate Co. of India Ltd. v. State of Bihar,
Sheela Devi v. Jaspal Singh, and Punjab
National Bank v. O.C.Krishnan, this Court had
held that where hierarchy of appeals is
provided by the statute, party must exhaust
the statutory remedy before resorting to writ
jurisdiction."
Titaghur Paper Mills Co. Ltd vs State Of Orissa on 13 April, 1983
In G.Verappa Pillai v. Raman & Raman Ltd.,
CCE v. Dunlop India Ltd., Ramendra Kishore
Biswas v. State of Tripura, Shiv Gonda Anna
Patil v. State of Maharashtra, C.A. Abraham v.
I.T.O, Titaghur Paper Mills Co. Ltd. v. State
of Orissa, H.B.Gandhi v. Gopinath & Sons,
Whirlpool Corpn. V. Registrar of Trademarks,
Tin Plate Co. of India Ltd. v. State of Bihar,
Sheela Devi v. Jaspal Singh, and Punjab
National Bank v. O.C.Krishnan, this Court had
held that where hierarchy of appeals is
provided by the statute, party must exhaust
the statutory remedy before resorting to writ
jurisdiction."
Tin Plate Co. Of India Ltd vs State Of Bihar And Ors on 5 November, 1998
In G.Verappa Pillai v. Raman & Raman Ltd.,
CCE v. Dunlop India Ltd., Ramendra Kishore
Biswas v. State of Tripura, Shiv Gonda Anna
Patil v. State of Maharashtra, C.A. Abraham v.
I.T.O, Titaghur Paper Mills Co. Ltd. v. State
of Orissa, H.B.Gandhi v. Gopinath & Sons,
Whirlpool Corpn. V. Registrar of Trademarks,
Tin Plate Co. of India Ltd. v. State of Bihar,
Sheela Devi v. Jaspal Singh, and Punjab
National Bank v. O.C.Krishnan, this Court had
held that where hierarchy of appeals is
provided by the statute, party must exhaust
the statutory remedy before resorting to writ
jurisdiction."
Sheela Devi vs Jaspal Singh on 13 July, 1998
In G.Verappa Pillai v. Raman & Raman Ltd.,
CCE v. Dunlop India Ltd., Ramendra Kishore
Biswas v. State of Tripura, Shiv Gonda Anna
Patil v. State of Maharashtra, C.A. Abraham v.
I.T.O, Titaghur Paper Mills Co. Ltd. v. State
of Orissa, H.B.Gandhi v. Gopinath & Sons,
Whirlpool Corpn. V. Registrar of Trademarks,
Tin Plate Co. of India Ltd. v. State of Bihar,
Sheela Devi v. Jaspal Singh, and Punjab
National Bank v. O.C.Krishnan, this Court had
held that where hierarchy of appeals is
provided by the statute, party must exhaust
the statutory remedy before resorting to writ
jurisdiction."
Punjab National Bank vs O.C. Krishnan And Ors on 13 August, 2001
In G.Verappa Pillai v. Raman & Raman Ltd.,
CCE v. Dunlop India Ltd., Ramendra Kishore
Biswas v. State of Tripura, Shiv Gonda Anna
Patil v. State of Maharashtra, C.A. Abraham v.
I.T.O, Titaghur Paper Mills Co. Ltd. v. State
of Orissa, H.B.Gandhi v. Gopinath & Sons,
Whirlpool Corpn. V. Registrar of Trademarks,
Tin Plate Co. of India Ltd. v. State of Bihar,
Sheela Devi v. Jaspal Singh, and Punjab
National Bank v. O.C.Krishnan, this Court had
held that where hierarchy of appeals is
provided by the statute, party must exhaust
the statutory remedy before resorting to writ
jurisdiction."
U.P. State Spinning Co. Ltd vs R.S. Pandey And Anr on 26 September, 2005
6. Further applying the said ratio in the matter of U.P.
State Spinning Co. Ltd. v. R.S.Pandey and another2, the
Hon'ble Supreme Court observed as under:
U.P. State Bridge Corporation Ltd. & Ors vs U.P. Rajya Setu Nigam S.Karamchari ... on 13 February, 2004
In U.P.State Bridge Corpn. Ltd. v. U.P.
Rajya Setu Nigam S. Karmachari Sangh, it was
held that when the dispute relates to
enforcement of a right or obligation under the
statute and specific remedy is, therefore,
provided under the statute, the High Court
should not deviate from the general view and
interfere under Article 226 except when a very
strong case is made out for making a
departure. The person who insists upon such
remedy can avail of the process as provided
under the statute.